NCT06777368ClinicalTrials.gov
REdo tranScatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Transcatheter aOrtic Valve failuRE
In brief
The purpose of this study is to generate clinical evidence on valve safety and performance in subjects treated by redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR).
Observational225 participants sought71 sites1 country
Categories
Registered in 1 registry
- ClinicalTrials.govNCT06777368Open this record at ClinicalTrials.govSynced 2 months ago
One study can be registered in several registries. We show it once and link every record we hold.
Trial information is shown as published by the registry, in its original language.
Interested in this study?
Sign in or create an account to register your interest and follow this study.
How this study is set up
The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.
- Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2025-01-15; recorded start 2025-02-06
- Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
- Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
- Not stated: Whether participants are randomly assigned is not stated in the registry recordNo allocation method is recorded
- Not stated: A comparison group is not stated in the registry recordThe record describes a single study arm
- Not stated: Whether the study is blinded is not stated in the registry recordNo masking information is recorded
- Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
- Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
- Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
- Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
- Present: Sponsor has 19 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Medtronic Cardiovascular)
- Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
- The record lists 1 condition.
- Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.
Trial stature
Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.
An exploratory-stage design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.
How this score is built
- Randomised allocation0/20
Allocation not stated in the record
- Blinding0/20
Masking not stated in the record
- Control arm0/15
No comparator arm stated in the record
- Primary-outcome specificity10/10
Named primary outcome with a defined time frame
- Endpoint type3/10
Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)
- Multi-centre8/8
Multi-centre: 71 sites
- Data monitoring committee7/7
A data monitoring committee is in place
- Prospective registration5/5
Registered before the study start date
- Protocol / SAP posted0/5
No protocol or SAP posted to the registry
A medium-sized study: 225 participants (target), run at 71 sites.
How this score is built
- Enrolment23/40
225 participants (target)
- Site count21/25
71 sites
- Country count0/15
Single country
- Planned duration8/10
Planned over about 33 months
- Sponsor scale4/10
Medtronic Cardiovascular has led 19 trials in our corpus
We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.
How this score is built
- Investigator standing0/100
No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial
These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.
Summary
The purpose of this study is to generate clinical evidence on valve safety and performance in subjects treated by redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR).
Conditions
- Aortic Stenosis
Eligibility
| Sex | All |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years – 105 Years |
| Healthy volunteers | No |
| Sampling method | NON_PROBABILITY_SAMPLE |
Study population
The study population includes patients with symptomatic heart disease due to BVF affecting TAVs and requiring redo TAVR.
Eligibility as written in the registry
Eligibility in plain statements
This record's criteria have not been broken into separate statements yet. The registry text above is complete and is the authoritative version.
Study design
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Phase | Not stated in the registry record |
| Allocation | Not stated in the registry record |
| Intervention model | Not stated in the registry record |
| Primary purpose | Not stated in the registry record |
| Masking | Not stated in the registry record |
| Enrolment | 225 participants sought |
Sponsor and collaborators
- Medtronic Cardiovascular Sponsor
Arms and interventions
- Medtronic Transcatheter Aortic Valves (TAV) or Edwards Transcatheter Aortic Valves (TAV)
Subjects will receive either a Medtronic TAV or Edwards TAV
Interventions
- Device Edwards TAV
Edwards TAV where commercially available.
- Device Medtronic TAV
Medtronic TAV where commercially available
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome Measure
30-day redo TAVR success defined as correct positioning of a single redo prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomic location, intended performance of the valve (mean gradient \<20mmHg, peak velocity \<3 m/s, Doppler velocity index (DVI) ≥0.25, aortic regurgitation (AR) \< moderate), and freedom from all-cause mortality, coronary obstruction, unplanned coronary revascularization, and surgery or intervention related to the device
Time frame Early (30-days)
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome Measure
a composite endpoint of 1-year freedom from all-cause mortality, all stroke, or any re-hospitalization for valve or redo TAVR procedure-related causes
Time frame Late (1-year)
Secondary outcome
Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) 3 technical success (at exit from procedure room)
(VARC) 3 technical success (at exit from procedure room)
Time frame Time of procedure
Secondary outcome
VARC 3 30-day device success
30-day device success
Time frame 30-Day
Secondary outcome
VARC 3 30-day early safety
30-day early safety
Time frame 30-Day
Secondary outcome
Peak and mean invasive gradient post-procedure
Peak and mean invasive gradient will be measured in mmHg
Time frame Time of procedure
Secondary outcome
In-hospital clinical outcomes
Percentage of all participants with all-cause mortality, all stroke, Myocardial infarction (MI), Coronary artery obstruction, Unplanned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG), Bleeding (VARC 3 type 1-4), Major and Minor vascular and access-related complications, Cardiac structural complications, Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) stage 1-4, Endocarditis, and Valve Thrombosis.
Time frame Treatment up to 7 days (or until patient is discharged from the hospital if later than 7 days)
Secondary outcome
Clinical outcomes at 30 days, 1-year, and annually thereafter
All-cause mortality, All stroke, Myocardial infarction (MI), Coronary artery obstruction, Bleeding (VARC 3 type 1-4), Major and Minor vascular and access-related complications, Cardiac structural complications, Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) stage 1-4, Endocarditis, Valve Thrombosis, Any rehospitalization and re-intervention.
Time frame 30 days, at 1 year, at 2 years, at 3 years, at 4 years, and at 5 years.
Secondary outcome
Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction (BVD) at the final required follow-up visit
Intrinsic permanent changes to the prosthetic valve, including wear and tear, leaflet disruption, flail leaflet, leaflet fibrosis and/or calcification, or strut fracture or deformation
Time frame 5 year
Secondary outcome
Bioprosthetic Valve Failure (BVF) at the final required follow-up visit
Any bioprosthetic valve dysfunction associated with clinically expressive criteria (new-onset or worsening symptoms, left ventricle dilation/hypertrophy/dysfunction, or pulmonary hypertension) or irreversible Stage 3 Hemodynamic Valve Deterioration (HVD) or Aortic valve reoperation or re-intervention, or Valve-related death.
Time frame Through study completion or Up to 5-years
Secondary outcome
Echocardiographic assessment pre-discharge or at 30 days, 1-year, and annually thereafter
Left ventricular ejection fraction, mean gradient across aortic valve, effective orifice area, effective orifice area index, patient-prosthesis mismatch, Doppler Velocity Index, total aortic regurgitation, paravalvular aortic regurgitation, and transvalvular aortic regurgitation.
Time frame After the procedure and prior to discharge from the hospital, at 30 days, at 1 year, at 2 years, at 3 years, at 4 years, and at 5 years.
Secondary outcome
Evaluate coronary accessibility (e.g., commissural alignment, valve to valve alignment, etc.) based on Computed Tomography (CT) at either pre-discharge or 30 days
Evaluate coronary accessibility
Time frame Up to 30 days
Secondary outcome
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification at pre-discharge, 30 days, 1-year, and annually thereafter
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification
Time frame After the procedure and prior to discharge from the hospital, at 30 days, at 1 year, at 2 years, at 3 years, at 4 years, and at 5 years.
Secondary outcome
KCCQ Quality of life (QoL) assessments at 30 days, 1-year, and annually thereafter
QoL: KCCQ assessment
Time frame At 30 days, at 1 year, at 2 years, at 3 years, at 4 years, and at 5 years.
Secondary outcome
EQ5D Quality of life (QoL) assessments at 30 days, 1-year, and annually thereafter
QoL: EQ5D assessment
Time frame At 30 days, at 1 year, at 2 years, at 3 years, at 4 years, and at 5 years.
Dates
| Start date | February 6, 2025 (actual) |
|---|---|
| Primary completion | November 1, 2027 (estimated) |
| Completion | November 1, 2027 (estimated) |
| First posted | January 15, 2025 (actual) |
| Last updated | May 28, 2026 |
| Results posted | Not stated in the registry record |
| Status last verified | May 2026 |
Actual means the event happened. Estimated means the sponsor expects it. The two mean different things.
Locations
71 sites are recruiting
United States
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lehigh Valley Hospital | Allentown | Pennsylvania | Recruiting |
| University of Michigan Health | Ann Arbor | Michigan | Recruiting |
| Heart Hospital of Austin | Austin | Texas | Recruiting |
| Ascension Seton Medical Center Austin | Austin | Texas | Recruiting |
| Medstar Union Memorial Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | Recruiting |
| The Johns Hopkins Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | Recruiting |
| University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama | Recruiting |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | Recruiting |
| Brigham and Women's Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | Recruiting |
| Buffalo General Medical Center | Buffalo | New York | Recruiting |
| University of Vermont Medical Center | Burlington | Vermont | Recruiting |
| University of Virginia Medical Center | Charlottesville | Virginia | Recruiting |
| The Christ Hospital | Cincinnati | Ohio | Recruiting |
| Morton Plant Hospital | Clearwater | Florida | Recruiting |
| University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center | Cleveland | Ohio | Recruiting |
| OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital | Columbus | Ohio | Recruiting |
| MercyOne Iowa Heart Center | Des Moines | Iowa | Recruiting |
| Henry Ford Hospital | Detroit | Michigan | Recruiting |
| Inova Fairfax Hospital | Falls Church | Virginia | Recruiting |
| HealthPark Medical Center, Lee Memorial Health | Fort Myers | Florida | Recruiting |
| Parkview Health | Fort Wayne | Indiana | Recruiting |
| Corewell Health (Spectrum) | Grand Rapids | Michigan | Recruiting |
| Hartford Hospital | Hartford | Connecticut | Recruiting |
| University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston | Houston | Texas | Recruiting |
| Baylor Saint Luke's (The Texas Heart Institute) | Houston | Texas | Recruiting |
| Houston Methodist Hospital | Houston | Texas | Recruiting |
| Saint Vincent Heart Center of Indiana | Indianapolis | Indiana | Recruiting |
| University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics | Iowa City | Iowa | Recruiting |
| St. Luke's Hospital of Kansas City | Kansas City | Missouri | Recruiting |
| The University of Kansas | Kansas City | Kansas | Recruiting |
| Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | Lebanon | New Hampshire | Recruiting |
| Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center | Los Angeles | California | Recruiting |
| Medical Center of the Rockies | Loveland | Colorado | Recruiting |
| Catholic Medical Center | Manchester | New Hampshire | Recruiting |
| Northwell Health | Manhasset | New York | Recruiting |
| UPMC Pinnacle | Mechanicsburg | Pennsylvania | Recruiting |
| Aurora St. Lukes Medical Center | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | Recruiting |
| Froedtert Hospital | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | Recruiting |
| Abbott Northwestern/Minneapolis Heart | Minneapolis | Minnesota | Recruiting |
| Providence Saint Patrick Hospital | Missoula | Montana | Recruiting |
| TriStar Centennial Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | Recruiting |
| St. Thomas West Hospital | Nashville | Tennessee | Recruiting |
| Jersey Shore University Medical Center | Neptune City | New Jersey | Recruiting |
| Yale New Haven Hospital | New Haven | Connecticut | Recruiting |
| NYU Langone Medical Center | New York | New York | Recruiting |
| Mount Sinai Hospital | New York | New York | Recruiting |
| Sentara Norfolk General Hospital | Norfolk | Virginia | Recruiting |
| Oklahoma Heart Hospital | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | Recruiting |
| Orlando Health/Orlando Regional Medical Center | Orlando | Florida | Recruiting |
| The Valley Hospital | Paramus | New Jersey | Recruiting |
21 further sites are listed in the registry record.
Study documents
No documents are linked in this registry record.
Changes over time
No changes have been recorded since we first ingested this record.
A change is recorded each time the sponsor updates the registry record. Status, dates, enrolment and sites appear here as they move.